As some of you may or may not know, we seabird biologists
here on SEFI tend to spend a lot of our time working in the various blinds
around the island. For a quick description on the different blinds around the
island, check out this blog post from 2007.
What do we do in these blinds? Well, the majority of the time we are looking
through binoculars or spotting scopes at a number of different Common Murre and
Brandt’s Cormorants breeding subcolonies. We record individual attendance at
nest sites, we assess nest condition (for the Cormorants; the Common Murres
don’t have nests), we check to see if there are eggs or chicks present, and of
course, we spend a long time trying to read the tiny metal and or plastic bands
that are on the birds legs. Thankfully, all of this can be accomplished from the
safety of a well secured small wooden box perched atop a precipice which
ensures that we do not flush any of our feathered friends from their respective
roosting spots.
The view of Corm Blind from the water: our safely secured box on the cliffside. Photo RJ Roush. |
How are we able to do all this
from a far distance away? With the use of our trusty scopes and binoculars, of
course! Well, I’m sure some of you are thinking, “So? What’s the big deal?” And
herein lies my point du jour: we are in a great debt to those glass objects
which allow us to visually cover great distances. We often fail to acknowledge
this awesome tool we have; we take it for granted. Without the small piece of
technology that is the lens—allowing us to magnify images 10-60x and beyond—reading
bands on some of these species would be downright preposterous.
An unusual upside-down view of West End from the lens of our spotting scope. Photo RJ Roush. |
As I
sat up in the Corm Blind one chilly evening, I started mulling over a scenario
in which we would have to read a metal band without the use of any kind of
glass. First off, you would need to ditch the blind all together. The relative
comfort that the blind offers is nice and all, but you can’t read a band with
the naked eye from a few dozen meters out. This means you need to get close to
the bird, very, very close. The numbers printed on the bands for the Brandt’s
Cormorants are roughly size 22 font in a word document and the Common Murre
numbers are closer to size 12.
Our
number one priority is to not disturb the birds while studying them. After all,
what good is getting a read on a band if the individual wearing the band
abandons it’s nest site? So, we need to get close enough to read the band
number without flushing the bird. A simple concept, but these birds are very
observant of their surroundings and are quick to fly off if they see or hear
something unusual and an odd biologist walking into their colony would clearly
count as something unusual. So, we turn to stealth. Not the ninja kind of
stealth where you hide in the shadows—there aren’t many human sized places to
hide—no, you will need to hide in plain sight of the birds. The easiest way I
can think to do this is to move extraordinarily slowly. We’re talking molasses
in the Arctic slow; glacially slow. I can picture it now. Crawling along on the
lice-ridden (Cormorants are known to harbor countless lice in their nests),
muddy ground for the better part of a day to read a few digits on a single
band. You are the sea-soaked soil which the birds sit on; you are the Farallon
Weed which covers the island; you are nothing more than a stone that happens to
be on the move.
Your
normal field work clothes, though thoroughly covered in dirt and bird
excrement, will simply not work, either. The birds will likely take notice of a
strange humanoid shaped object advancing toward their home. The Brandt’s Cormorants
are unlikely to let you join the party unless you are wearing the correct
attire, so a disguise is of utmost importance. Now, I have thought about sewing
together a cormorant suit for just such an occasion, but after further
consideration, I decided that would be ridiculous. So, instead of a human-sized
Cormorant, you will need to do more than just think you are the soil,
vegetation and stones of the island, you will need to don them as a carefully
crafted cloak to conceal your identity. In other words: camouflage.
So, how are we doing? Covered
head-to-toe in Farallon Weed and soil and the like, crawling slower than slow
towards a birds nest with the intent of reading the size 22 (hopefully) or size
12 font engraved on the metal band around it’s ankle over the course of hours
or perhaps even days. Now that would be some serious dedication to the
seabirds. I, for one, am wholly overwhelmed with gratitude for the fine glass
that we utilize whilst on the job. As both a budding bird biologist and a photographer,
I pay homage to the tools that I and my peers use on a daily basis on the
island.
A few of the "tools" that I use on a daily basis on SEFI. Look at all that glass! Photo RJ Roush. |
These few items allow us to not
only gather the all-important data which helps us better understand the
organisms and the systems which they interact with, but it allows us to bring
these creatures closer to us. It allows us to see them up close, to observe
them, and when taking photos, to share their beauty with countless others.
Much thanks to you, glass.
Taking photos of wildlife at sunset. Photo credit to Emma Kelsey |
words by RJ Roush
2 comments:
Sounds idyllic, keep the good work, what you do is admirable!!
I just got here to tihs blog, so forgive me if you have already wrote about this.,..but if you love the Islands so much what are you and what can we do about this:Between 1946 and 1970, the US dumped ~107,000 drums of radioactive wastes at its two sites,
including some 47,800 in the ocean west of San Francisco, supposedly at three designated sites.
However drums actually litter an area of at least 1,400 square kilometers/540 square miles,
known as the Farallon Island Radioactive Waste Dump, which now falls almost entirely within
the boundaries of the Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary. The exact location of
most drums is unknown. At least some are corroding.A 1996 paper in Health Physics described some of the radionuclides found in the tissues of deep
-sea bottom-feeding fishes—Dover sole, sablefish, and thornyheads—plus intertidal mussels in
the waters around the Farallon Islands: Concentrations of both [plutonium-238] and [Americium
-241] in fish tissues were notably higher than those reported in literature from any other sites
world-wide, including potentially contaminated sites. These results show approximately 10
times higher concentrations of [plutonium-238+240] and approximately 40-50 times higher
concentrations of [plutonium-238] than those values reported for identical fish species from
1977 collections at the [Farallon Islands Nuclear Waste Dump Site]. Of course the fallen satellites,
the sunken submarines, the leftovers from nuclear bomb tests, and the dumped drums of waste
are all subject to saltwater corrosion and the same destructive tectonic forces that trigg
ered the March 11th Sendai earthquake and tsunami. ID LIKE TO DO SOMETHING!
Post a Comment